ASR evaluation
Review automatic speech recognition outputs for word accuracy, semantic match, punctuation, intent recognition, and performance across accents or languages.
Evaluate recognition, synthesis, assistants, wakewords and audio classification across languages, accents and real-world acoustic conditions.
Evaluation plans reflect your languages, users, devices, environments and product success criteria.
Review automatic speech recognition outputs for word accuracy, semantic match, punctuation, intent recognition, and performance across accents or languages.
Evaluate voice assistant responses, conversation flow, intent handling, and user interaction quality in real-world usage scenarios.
Evaluate speech model performance across languages, dialects, accents, and local speech patterns to support more reliable global voice systems.
Assess text-to-speech outputs for naturalness, pronunciation, prosody, clarity, speaker consistency, and overall listening experience.
Measure wakeword and keyword detection accuracy, latency, false accepts, and false rejects across varied acoustic environments.
Review and validate audio labels for emotion, speaker identity, language, acoustic events, domain-specific sounds, and other speech or non-speech features.
We combine native-language judgment, acoustic variation and structured error labels to show where voice systems succeed or fail.
A calibrated workflow turns human listening into comparable measures and clear error examples.
Align languages, speakers, environments, devices, tasks and metrics.
Run representative audio tests and collect structured judgments.
Group recognition, naturalness, latency and acoustic failures.
Deliver metrics, examples, segment findings and follow-up tests.
Share your audio samples, model workflow and target metrics. We’ll propose a focused evaluation plan.
Discuss an audio evaluation pilot ↗