RLHF services

Human preferences that move models toward better behavior.

Collect structured rankings, scores and multilingual feedback for reward modeling, reinforcement learning and task-specific alignment.

Qualified human ratersPreference calibrationMultilingual feedbackManaged QA
What we collect

Human preference signals for model alignment.

Feedback workflows are designed around your model, task, user expectations, languages and target behavior.

Pairwise output ranking

Compare model responses side by side to identify which output better matches user intent, task requirements, and quality standards.

Scaled preference scoring

Rate AI outputs using structured scoring scales to capture differences in helpfulness, accuracy, coherence, safety, and overall response quality.

Open-ended feedback collection

Collect detailed human feedback on model outputs to identify issues in tone, fluency, factuality, safety, and instruction following.

Task-specific alignment evaluation

Evaluate model behavior against custom criteria designed for each use case, such as response safety, refusal quality, or domain accuracy.

Multilingual feedback workflows

Gather human feedback across languages, regions, and cultural contexts to improve model alignment for global users.

Reward model training data output

Prepare structured preference and feedback datasets that can support reward modeling, reinforcement learning, and model alignment workflows.

Built for alignment

Feedback workflows matched to the behavior you value.

We turn task definitions into clear comparison rubrics and calibrated human judgments across languages and user contexts.

01Reward model data
02Assistant helpfulness
03Safety & refusal quality
04Multilingual alignment
How we deliver

From preference rubric to training-ready feedback.

A calibrated workflow keeps rankings consistent, disagreements measurable and output structured for downstream use.

Define preferences

Align tasks, response qualities, scoring scales, policies and thresholds.

Train & calibrate

Qualify raters through examples, comparisons and feedback.

Rank & review

Collect judgments with consensus, audits and disagreement analysis.

Structure & deliver

Provide preference datasets with quality findings and documentation.

Build human preference data for better model alignment.

Share your model outputs, target behavior and evaluation criteria. We’ll propose a focused RLHF pilot.

Discuss an RLHF pilot ↗