Response validation and scoring
Review responses for factual accuracy, completeness, tone, relevance, safety, and alignment with project requirements.
Create and validate instructions, responses and multilingual examples that teach models to be accurate, helpful, safe and context-aware.
Data programs are shaped around your use case, domains, languages, policies and definition of an ideal response.
Review responses for factual accuracy, completeness, tone, relevance, safety, and alignment with project requirements.
Write accurate, helpful, and context-appropriate responses that demonstrate the ideal behavior your model should learn.
Create and review fine-tuning examples across languages and locales to support more natural, culturally aware model behavior.
Match prompts with high-quality responses to create structured training examples for supervised fine-tuning workflows.
Create clear, relevant, and task-specific instructions that reflect your use case, from open-ended prompts to complex workflow commands.
Evaluate training examples for potential bias, unsafe content, sensitive wording, or policy risks before they are used for model training.
We translate model goals into writer guidance, examples and review criteria that stay consistent across domains and languages.
A calibrated workflow keeps instructions realistic, responses high quality and safety risks controlled.
Align tasks, domains, policies, languages, formats and quality criteria.
Draft instructions and responses through trained native contributors.
Validate factuality, helpfulness, tone, safety and consistency.
Provide clean training pairs with quality findings and documentation.
Share your use case, policies and example tasks. We’ll propose a focused data creation pilot.
Discuss an SFT data pilot ↗