Content moderation
Review and monitor user-generated content to ensure that it meets your standards and guidelines.
Turn raw language data into structured signals for moderation, search, classification, conversational AI and language model training.
Annotation schemes are aligned with your taxonomy, domain, edge cases and quality targets, then applied by trained Vietnamese reviewers.
Review and monitor user-generated content to ensure that it meets your standards and guidelines.
Adapt text and language content to fit the target culture, market, audience, and local communication style.
Detect and label offensive, abusive, hateful, or unsafe language to support content safety and moderation workflows.
Identify and label important keywords, phrases, and search terms to improve information retrieval and text classification.
Classify text into predefined action or request categories to help AI systems understand what users want to do.
Annotate grammatical features such as parts of speech, sentence structure, tense, dependency, and linguistic patterns.
Label text based on expressed emotion, opinion, attitude, or sentiment polarity such as positive, negative, or neutral.
Analyze text for meaning, context, tone, structure, and language patterns to support better AI understanding.
Review and assess written content for quality, relevance, clarity, accuracy, and overall usefulness.
Label text according to industry-specific categories, terminology, and subject areas such as finance, legal, healthcare, or technology.
Analyze conversations and classify utterances based on intent, function, context, and interaction flow.
Label text with linguistic information such as syntax, grammar, meaning, and structure for language model training.
Identify the purpose behind a user message, query, or utterance to support chatbots and conversational AI systems.
Identify and classify named entities such as people, locations, organizations, products, dates, and other key terms.
We translate your ontology and decision rules into clear workflows for native reviewers, with ambiguity surfaced early.
A managed workflow keeps decisions consistent, disagreements visible and quality measurable as volume grows.
Align labels, examples, edge cases, domains, volume and acceptance criteria.
Qualify native reviewers through practice batches and guideline feedback.
Run controlled production with consensus, audits and issue resolution.
Provide structured labels with quality findings and decision documentation.
Share your taxonomy, sample data and quality targets. We’ll propose a focused annotation plan with clear review criteria.
Discuss your text annotation project ↗